Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sheiner v. Supervalu Inc.
as 7:2022cv10262
Plaintiff:
Jesse Sheiner
Defendant:
Supervalu Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Burchett v. Supervalu Inc.
as 1:2018cv05613
Plaintiff:
Simon Burchett
Defendant:
Supervalu Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
O'Brien v. Acme Markets Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09887
Defendant:
Acme Markets Inc. , Albertsons Companies Inc. , Albertsons Companies, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Ann O'Brien
Cross_defendant:
Acme Markets Inc. , Albertsons Companies Inc. , Albertsons Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litigation (NO II)
as 1:2011md02221
Plaintiff:
Ahold U.S.A. Inc., Albertson's LLC, Animal Land, Inc. and others
In Re:
American Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litigation (NO II)
Defendant:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Interested Party:
Government Plaintiffs in 10-cv-4496
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Meijer, Inc. et al v. American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00338
Defendant:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Publix Super Markets, Inc., Raley's and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Supervalu Inc. v. Ectaco Inc.
as 1:2010cv05267
Defendant:
Ectaco Inc.
Plaintiff:
Supervalu Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Slatzer v. Time, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03281
Plaintiff:
Deborah Slatzer
Defendant:
Time, Inc., Time Inc. Home Entertainment, Anderson News Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Shihong v. Supervalu, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv06258
Plaintiff:
Sang Shihong
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc., Jeff Noodle and Pamela K. Knous
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
McMahon et al v. Supervalu, Inc.
as 6:2008cv01080
Plaintiff:
Christine McMahon, Mark Manna, UFCW Local One Health Care Fund and others
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Ephedra Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2004md01598
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Carter, Maria Palacios, James Wende and others
Claimant:
Mellissa Barr, Official Committee of Ephedra Claimants of TL Administration Corporation and TL Administration Inc., Ozan Cirak and others
Defendant:
United States, Vera Kunisch, Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bio-Mark International, Inc., Garden State Nutritionals, a division of Vitaquest International, Inc., Sportika Export, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
GMP Laboratories of America, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Wyeth Consumer Healthcare, Ltd.
Cross Claimant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Vitalabs, Inc., The Chemins Company Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Jennifer Shaffer Maxwell and Sitrick and Company
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
John C Thornton, Esquire Arnold Levin, Basic Research LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael T. Yost
Special Master:
James Niss
Interested Party:
Ad Hoc Committee of Tort Claimants, Buchanan Ingersoll PC for Itself, as Former Attorneys for The Official Ephedra Claimants Committee and The Ad Hoc Committee of Ephedra Claimants, Starr Excess Insurance Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Twin Laboratories, Incorporated, Twin Lab Corporation, AST Sports Science, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Twinlab Direct, Inc. (d/b/a Changes International, Inc.), Chattem, Inc., The Burgess Group Simply Weight Loss and others
Not Classified By Court:
north shore univesity hospital, EFRAN HUSSAIN, M.D., NILYA BHAWSAR, D.O. and others
Counter Defendant:
Blue California and Motherland International, Inc.
Trustee:
Trustee David M. Higgins and David M. Higgins Of The Settlement Law Group
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ken Lilly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
