Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv01451
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", tiefeng, YONGAJAec and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Texkhan, Inc. v. Superline, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05556
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, SW Group, LLC, Superline, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Texkhan, Inc. and Texkhan, Inc. a California Corporation, individually and doing business as Hyup Sung T.R.D.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Fabric Selection, Inc. v. Superline, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08385
Defendant:
Bealls Outlet Stores, Inc., Bealls, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Fabric Selection, Inc.
Couture Textile, Inc. v. Superline, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07199
Plaintiff:
Couture Textile, Inc.
Defendant:
Danice Stores, Inc., Does, Pull K. Park and others
Universal Dyeing and Printing Inc v. Sans Souci, LLC
as 2:2017cv05696
Defendant:
Does, Sans Souci, LLC and Superline, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Universal Dyeing and Printing Inc .
Unicolors, Inc. v. Allen Yang et al
as 2:2017cv04473
Defendant:
2NE1 Apparel, Inc., Does, Kevin J and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Unicolors, Inc.
Matrix International Textile Inc v. Ross Stores Inc et al
as 2:2017cv03415
Defendant:
Does, Meetu Magic Inc, Mega Wear Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Matrix International Textile Inc
C and SM Int'l v. NB Brother Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01326
Plaintiff:
C and SM Int'l
Defendant:
Does, NB Brother Corporation, Ross Stores, Inc. and others
NS Intl Textiles v. Superline, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01320
Defendant:
Closet Signature Fashion Valley Mall, Does and Superline, Inc.
Plaintiff:
NS Intl Textiles
C&SM INT'L. v. NB Brother Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv01321
Plaintiff:
C&SM INT'L.
Defendant:
NB Brother Corp., Ross Stores and Superline
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
