Cases 1 - 10 of 750
In re: Randall Sutton
as 24-3423
Petitioner:
In re: RANDALL SUTTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
King v. Sharma et al
as 1:2024cv03416
Plaintiff:
Sutton King
Defendant:
Sashi Sharma, John Sharma and Royal York Equities Corp. doing business as JFK Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Hoglan et al v. M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657 et al
as 1:2024mc21628
Plaintiff:
Ju-Hsiu Jian, Jason Ruben Moreno, Christian B Stallworth and others
Defendant:
M/V Bluefins, IMO Number 922657, M/V Boceanica, IMO Number 9267132, M/V B Luminosa, IMO Number 9256016 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Deng v. Henry, et al.
as 24-1960
Plaintiff:
TONY DENG
Defendant:
UNKNOWN HENRY, Deputy Warden, Cook Unit, ROCKY SUTTON, CO IV, UNKNOWN BARNES, Officer and others
Hakimyar et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Karim Hakimyar, Zara Karim, S.K. and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
USA v. Robert Sutton, Jr.
as 24-1078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT D. SUTTON, JR.
SALEM v. SUTTON
as 8:2024cv00287
In Re:
MOUSSY SALEM
Respondent:
SAUL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
SALEM v. SUTTON
as 8:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
MOUSSY SALEM
Respondent:
SAUL SUTTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
