Cases 31 - 40 of 899
RICHARDSON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68113
Plaintiff:
ELEANORE ANNE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68092
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C RUNGE
Defendant:
A C & S INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RISCHAR v. AC&S et al
as 2:2010cv68088
Plaintiff:
CHARLES G RISCHAR
Defendant:
AC&S, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPHERD v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68115
Plaintiff:
DAVID L SHEPHERD
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOUBET v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68091
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D DOUBET
Defendant:
A C & S INC, AMERICAN STEEL AND WIRE CO, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEST v. AC & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68120
Plaintiff:
MERLE WEST
Defendant:
AC & S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRADDOCK v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68114
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRADDOCK
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68112
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERTS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AW CHESTERTON CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAGG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67761
Plaintiff:
MORRIS FAGG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KREJCAREK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67789
Plaintiff:
MELVIN KREJCAREK
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
