Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Panchal et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pina Panchal and South Tampa Cardiology, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 0:2023mc62400
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG, LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Manresa v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61330
Plaintiff:
Julia Manresa
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Todd v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2023cv14024
Plaintiff:
Wesley Todd
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
