Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Wasia Maya v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-1305
Petitioner:
Wasia Kessi Maya
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Not Classified By Court:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director U.S. ICE, Henry Lucero, U.S. ICE Director Chicago Field Office and others
E Xiong v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-2895
Petitioner:
E Xiong
Respondent:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Tony H. Pham, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Marco Corchado-Perez v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-2605
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Corchado-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Wasia Maya v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-2573
Appellant:
Wasia Kessi Maya
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Not Classified By Court:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director U.S. ICE, Henry Lucero, U.S. ICE Director Chicago Field Office and others
Omar Mohamed v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-2211
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Eric Holien, Sheriff, Kandiyohi County, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Omar Osman Mohamed
Ruachkuoth Thok v. Marcos Charles, et al
as 21-1389
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General, United States and others
Petitioner:
Ruachkuoth Wiyual Thok
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
