Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Tera Group, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 24-135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERA GROUP, INC., TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TERAEXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIGROUP, INC., CITIBANK, N.A., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED and others
Tera Group, Inc. et al v. Citigroup, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04302
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, TERAEXCHANGE, LLC and TERA GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016md02704
Defendant:
Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund Of Chicago and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Triangle T Partners, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Tradition America LLC, Tullett Prebon Americas Corporation and tpSEF, Inc.
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Petitioner:
Lawrence W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Tera Group, Inc. et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02858
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tera Group, Inc, Tera Advanced Technologies, LLC, TeraExchange, LLC and others
Interested Party:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
TERA GROUP, INC. et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv02837
Plaintiff:
TERA GROUP, INC., TERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TERAEXCHANGE, LLC
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
