Cases 11 - 20 of 110
Clotz v. The Federal Savings Bank
as 1:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
Terry Clotz
Defendant:
The Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Maier et al v. Domke et al
as 1:2022cv03284
Plaintiff:
Terry Maier and Denise Maier
Defendant:
J C Domke and Robert Alexovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ahmad v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Sharjeel Ahmad
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Clifford Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Officer Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adkisson et al v. Eagleson et al
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Adkisson, Sylvia Collins, Terry Price and others
Defendant:
Theresa A. Eagleson and Grace B Hou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Turner v. Pacific Garden Mission et al
as 1:2021cv02204
Defendant:
Sampson Green, James Ford, Jr., Larry Roches and others
Plaintiff:
Ethan Wayne Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santos Manzanares v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv07100
Defendant:
Director Terri A. Robinson, U.S. Attorney John R. Lausch Jr., Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Elvin Santos Manzanares
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
