Cases 1 - 7 of 7
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60635
Petitioner:
State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Inhance Technologies. v. EPA
as 23-60620
Petitioner:
Inhance Technologies, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60300
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60069
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Luminant Generation Company, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Sierra Club, et al v. EPA, et al
as 18-60116
Petitioner:
SIERRA CLUB, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and ENTERGY LOUISIANA, L.L.C.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. EPA, et al
as 18-60102
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, GULF RESTORATION NETWORK and LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ANNE IDSAL, Region 6 Administrator
Luminant Generation Co., L.L.C, et al v. EPA, et al
as 12-60694
Petitioner:
LUMINANT GENERATION COMPANY, L.L.C. and ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
