Cases 1 - 5 of 5
OH, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-4235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, in their official capacities, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
FTC, et al v. FHTM, Inc., et al
as 15-5325
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATE OF ILLINOIS, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY and others
Third Party - Appellee:
ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
FHTM, INC., a Kentucky Corporation, et al.
Appellant:
YVONNE DAY, LEONARD HASLAG, JAMES MCCORMICK and others
USA, et al v. Chattanooga-Hamilton Co Hosp.
as 13-6645
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WHIPPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, dba Erlanger Medical Center, dba Erlanger Health System
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
