Cases 11 - 20 of 311
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03826
Plaintiff:
ALLAN DOUGLAS WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
KAVANAGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03503
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA KAVANAGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN R. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
KHLOEUNG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02463
Plaintiff:
VUTHNY KHLOEUNG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
AKBAR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02382
Plaintiff:
SYED AKBAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant:
1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
ABALE GNALEGA v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
REUEL JACQUES ABALE GNALEGA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
MOHAMMED v. COOPER et al
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COOPER, BERYL A. HOWELL, JAMES BOASBERG and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Joann Brown
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
RYALS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA RYALS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
