Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Boettner v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00501
Petitioner:
David John Boettner, Jr
Respondent:
USA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zavala v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv00476
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Zavala
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hawkins v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Keith Yordy, CL Otter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner et al v. Ada County et al
as 1:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Bonner, Detrick Curtis Conerly, Michael Griffith and others
Defendant:
Ada County, Canyon County, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, United States of America, C. L. Otter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Defendant:
United States of America, Bush, Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madrigal v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00467
Petitioner:
Rafael Madrigal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Estrada-Jasso v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00434
Petitioner:
Doroteo Estrada-Jasso
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conerly v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Petitioner:
Detrick Curtis Conerly
Respondent:
United States of America, State of Idaho and Ada County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conerly v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
Detrick Curtis Conerly
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
