Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Keith Webb-El v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 19-5229
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy S. Stewart, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland, Scott Kubic, Parole Examiner, U.S. Parole Commission, Thomas R. Kane, Deputy Director, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith B. Webb-El
James Vandivere, et al v. Loretta E. Lynch, et al
as 17-5211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Dow Vandivere and Jon Karl Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Thomas R. Kane, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Keith Webb-el v. Thomas Kane, et al
as 17-5159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith B. Webb-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas R. Kane, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Office, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot, Commissioner, U.S. Parole Commission, A. Smith, A-2 Unit Counselor, Federal Correctional Institution and others
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 17-5120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., John Dignam and Thomas R. Kane, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-5277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Karen Ripple, et al
as 16-5097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen Ripple, Fed. Probation Ofc., Intake Counsel, D.C. Bar Assn., Supervisor, Fed. Probation Office and others
Lent Carr, II v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 12-5048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lent C. Carr, II
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, United States of America, United States Department of Justice and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
