Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Larry Rosser v. H. Sanchez, et al
as 13-55610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY ROSSER
Defendant - Appellee:
H. SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, E. APODACA, Correctional Officer, R. CROMBIE, Correctional Officer and others
Larry Rosser v. H. Sanchez, et al
as 11-80294
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
LARRY ROSSER
Defendant - Respondent:
H. SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, E. APODACA, Correctional Officer, R. CROMBIE, Correctional Officer and others
Stanford Bryant v. J. Ochoa, et al
as 11-55153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANFORD PAUL BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TIM OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual, STUART J. RYAN, Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden, in his/her official capacity and as an individual and others
Gregory Rideau, Jr. v. L. Minnick, et al
as 10-56109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SYLVESTER RIDEAU, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L. MINNICK, Accountant I Supervisor, S. BABICH, Correctional Guard, L. KNAPP, Accountant Technician and others
Gregory Rideau, Jr. v. L. Minnick, et al
as 10-55151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SYLVESTER RIDEAU, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L. MINNICK, Accountant I Supervisor, S. BABRICH, Correctional Guard, S. BABICH, Correctional Guard and others
Gregory Ridean, Jr. v. L. Minnick, et al
as 09-56763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SYLVESTER RIDEAN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L. MINNICK, Accountant 1 Supervisor, S. BABRICH, Correctional Guard, L. KNAPP, Accountant Technician and others
Stanford Bryant v. Tim Ochoa, et al
as 09-55235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANFORD PAUL BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM OCHOA, Chief Deputy Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual, STUART J. RYAN, Warden, in his official capacity and as an individual, G. J. JANDA, Associate Warden, in his/her official capacity and as an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
