Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MENDEZ et al v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv04770
Plaintiff:
MAIRA MENDEZ and GUISSEPPE GUARNERI
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., JOHN DOE (1-10),said name being fictitious and unknown and used to connote either singular or multiple parties, CARY COE ( 1-10), said name being fictitious and unknown and used to connote either singular or multiple parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
DEMAREST v. NEW JERSEY CVS PHARMACY, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12473
Defendant:
MIKE MOE (1-10) AND/OR JKL INC. (1-10), TONY TOE (1-10) AND/OR XYZ INC. (1-10), JACK JOE (1-10) AND/OR UVW INC. (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
LISA DEMAREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLON-RODRIGUEZ v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv06199
Plaintiff:
ANA COLON-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PERRY POE 1-10 AND/IR VVV INC. 1-10, TONY TOE 1-10 AND/OR XYZ INC. 1-10 and others
Cross Defendant:
arbnwk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAPONE et al v. KOHL'S CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv05128
Defendant:
KOHL'S CORPORATION , MANNY MOE (1-10), JOHN DOE(1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA CAPONE and AURELIO T. CAPONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MENDOZA v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01087
Plaintiff:
LISSETTE MENDOZA
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , MANNY MOE (1-10), JOHN DOE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIANNONE v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02035
Plaintiff:
JAMES V. GIANNONE
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL INC. , ST. JUDE MEDICAL CARDIAC RHYTHMIC MANAGEMENT DIVISION , FRANK FOE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CIOLETTI v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03014
Plaintiff:
EVELYN CIOLETTI
Defendant:
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOE (1-10), MANNY MOE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
