Cases 1 - 10 of 20
CA Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Myung Family Partnership No. 1, LP et al
as 2:2023cv05054
Plaintiff:
CA Department of Toxic Substances Control and CA Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Myung Family Partnership No. 1, LP and Jung S Myung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Robert C. Frojen and Colleen Frojen Trust et al
as 8:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Robert C. Frojen and Colleen Frojen Trust, Colleen Frojen, Robert Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Manuel Reynoso
as 8:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Toxic Substances Control Account, California Department of Toxic Substances Control and The Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Manuel Reynoso doing business as Orange County Metal Processing and Manuel Reynoso individually and doing business as Orange County Metal Processing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company et al
as 4:2021cv07450
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Union Oil Company of California and Swepi LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07453
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Pacific Gas and Electric Company, The Dow Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
CA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control et al., v. Exxon Mobil Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv01739
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Inc., Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
CA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control et al v. Chevron Oronite Co. LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01737
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and Toxic Substances Control Account
Defendant:
Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Shell Oil Company and Atlantic Richfield Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. NL Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11293
Counter Claimant:
Kinsbursky Bros. Supply, Inc., Trojan Battery Company, LLC, International Metals Ekco, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Blount, Inc., Quemetco, Inc., Clarios, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and The Toxic Substances Control Account
3Rd Party Defendant:
O-I Glass Inc. f/k/a Owens-Illinois Inc, 12909 Cordary LLC, 20 20 08WYBO2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
California Department of Toxic, et al v. Century Indemnity Company, et al
as 20-15029
Defendant:
DAVID VAN OVER, individually, PACIFIC WOOD PRESERVING, a dissolved California corporation, WEST COAST WOOD PRESERVING, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLIANZ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACCOUNT and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Toxic Substances Control Account v. The FHL Financial Group
as 8:2019cv02370
Defendant:
The FHL Financial Group
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Toxic Substances Control Account
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
