Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Houston v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-840
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MAYOR, MIRANDA M. DU, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Houston v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, Division of Forestry; Bureau of Land Management, DE LA GARZA, JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff and others
Houston v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-397
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Houston v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-267
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies, et al.
as 24-240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, Clerk to RETURN w/out docketing any further submissions in this closed case, #37
Defendant / Appellee:
ENCORE EVENT TECHNOLOGIES and DIANNE FERRANTE
Houston v. Golden Entertainment, et al.
as 24-95
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, DIANNE FERRANTE and others
Houston v. Bean, et al.
as 23-3482
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
JEREMY BEAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Houston v. Ford et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Aaron D. Ford, Joseph M Lombardo, Brian E. Williams Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Bean et al
as 2:2023cv01349
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Brian Williams, Sr., Nevada Attorney General and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01210
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Brian Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
