Cases 1 - 8 of 8
QUICK et al v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv60014
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L QUICK and ARLENE S QUICK
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION , UNITED STATES GYPSUM , NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HELLER et al v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv75111
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HELLER, JOSEPH HELLER, JOSEPH HELLER and others
Defendant:
GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILES v. GARLOCK INC et al
as 2:2007cv65866
Plaintiff:
JESSE J. MILES, SR.
Defendant:
GARLOCK INC, GENERAL MOTORS CORP, GRIFFIN WHEEL CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOSKINS et al v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv61428
Plaintiff:
NORMAN L HOSKINS and VICKI HOSKINS
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED, ACANDS INCORPORATED, ACANDS INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ANTONE et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61422
Plaintiff:
PETER C ANTONE and PAT YARBOROUGH
Petitioner:
LISA R ANTONE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BLALOCK v. AMERICAN STANDARD INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2007cv61425
Plaintiff:
LEON O BLALOCK
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD INCORPORATED, OWENS CORNING, OWENS ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GRAHAM v. BUDD COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv61426
Plaintiff:
LONNIE W GRAHAM
Defendant:
BUDD COMPANY, BUDD COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THORNTON v. AMERICAN STANDARD INC. et al
as 2:2007cv61423
Plaintiff:
JAMES R THORNTON
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD INC., BUDD COMPANY, BUDD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
