Cases 21 - 30 of 3,202
HUTSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86913
Plaintiff:
LAVERNA HUTSON
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HUNT v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86321
Defendant:
BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRITESMAN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86498
Plaintiff:
CHARLES THOMAS WRITESMAN
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BRADY v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86142
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BRADY
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HILL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86156
Plaintiff:
STEVE HILL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BEATTY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86350
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, OAKFABCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY FRANCES BEATTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKWELL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE C. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HUDSON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86320
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., OAKFABCO, INC., JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY L. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGATHY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86463
Plaintiff:
ANNIE LOYCE MCGATHY
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
POPE v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86472
Plaintiff:
SHELDON R. POPE
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
