Cases 1 - 10 of 23
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigati
as 20-1994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Crosby Tugs, LLC, Meijer, Inc., Painters District Council No. 30 Health and Welfare Fund, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuitcals U.S.A., Inc. and others
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser
as 20-2002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Sales Company, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and others
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. American Sales Company, LLC
as 20-485
Respondent:
Cesar Castillo, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda America Holdings, Inc. and others
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. United Food and Commercial Wor
as 20-481
Respondent:
NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly sitiated, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund and others
Petitioner:
Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuitcals U.S.A., Inc. and others
In Re: Actos End Payor
as 15-3364
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, A.F. of L. A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United Food And Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health And Welfare Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 199 SEIU-National Benefit Fund, Crosby Tugs, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd., Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Sales Company, LLC and Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2015cv03505
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015cv03278
Plaintiff:
American Sales Company, LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2014cv03648
Plaintiff:
1199SEIU National Benefit Fund
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE ACTOS END PAYOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2014cv02846
Defendant:
Actavis plc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund and Teamsters Union Local 115 Health & Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
IN RE ACTOS END PAYOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2014cv02617
Plaintiff:
City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
