Cases 41 - 50 of 1,430
Rumble v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00120
Plaintiff:
Christina Rumble
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Bensusan v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00118
Plaintiff:
Rafaela Bensusan
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Asp-Maytash v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00117
Plaintiff:
Sharon M Asp-Maytash
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Remedor v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00119
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Remedor
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Price et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00111
Plaintiff:
Janice Fite Price , Charles H Fite, III and Patricia E Dunn
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0754
Kerr et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00112
Plaintiff:
Terry Clint Kerr , Jerry L Kerr and Larry D Kerr
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Montes v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00113
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Montes
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Conta v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00114
Plaintiff:
Carol Conta
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Murner Burgess et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00115
Plaintiff:
Teresa Gail Murner Burgess , Timothy Fleming Murner , Tammy Murner Pace and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Rivera v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00116
Plaintiff:
Christina Rivera
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
