Cases 51 - 60 of 6,319
Harrell et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00124
Plaintiff:
Iva A Harrell , Williams, Sr and Christi A Griffis
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Reed v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00126
Plaintiff:
Elbert B Reed
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
McCoy et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00122
Plaintiff:
Mary Lilly McCoy , Katha McCoy and Connie McCoy
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Marmolejo v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00121
Plaintiff:
Vicky Marmolejo
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Rumble v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00120
Plaintiff:
Christina Rumble
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Bensusan v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00118
Plaintiff:
Rafaela Bensusan
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Asp-Maytash v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00117
Plaintiff:
Sharon M Asp-Maytash
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Remedor v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00119
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Remedor
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Price et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00111
Plaintiff:
Janice Fite Price , Charles H Fite, III and Patricia E Dunn
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0754
Kerr et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00112
Plaintiff:
Terry Clint Kerr , Jerry L Kerr and Larry D Kerr
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
