Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Holtz et al v. China Green Agriculture, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07076
Plaintiff:
James Holtz and Rick Sherman
Defendant:
China Green Agriculture, Inc., Tao Li, Yongcheng Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
Microsoft Corporation v. GOLDAH.COM Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2017cv02896
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
GOLDAH.COM Network Technology Co., Ltd. , Changsha Xunyou Network Technology Co., Ltd. , Hunan Yigiyou Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tao Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71652
Petitioner:
TAO LI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rier et al v. Li et al
as 3:2011cv00178
Nominal Defendant:
China Green Agriculture, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert B. Fields, Kabani & Company, Tao Li and others
Plaintiff:
David A. McSherry, Sr. and Jamie Rier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Elliot v. China Green Agricultures, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00648
Defendant:
China Green Agricultures, Inc., Tao Li, Ken Ren and others
Plaintiff:
Frederic Elliot
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
