Cases 11 - 20 of 77
COFFINDAFFER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12619
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE COFFINDAFFER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BASLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12539
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE BASLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. HolaDoctor, Inc.
as 1:2022cv22204
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
HolaDoctor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nichols v. TOBIAS & ASSOCIATES INC.
as 9:2022cv80816
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Tobias & Associates, Inc. doing business as GetMeHealthcare
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cole v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Cole
Defendant:
Mike Williams, Carteraun, JFRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Genevish et al v. Great Plains Transport, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv02983
Plaintiff:
Melissa L. Genevish and Mahaley Mancillas
Defendant:
Great Plains Transport, Inc. and Terry Lee Trower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLFE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58636
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE WOLFE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARNEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55395
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE HARNEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51158
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strief et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00879
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Strief and Robyn A Strief
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
