Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America et al v. Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company et al
as 1:2012cv00023
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Roofing Supply Group - Kentucky, LLC
Defendant:
Perry Bartsch, Jr. Construction Company, AIC Roofing & Construction, Inc., Blaine B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America et al v. Kofi Consulting Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
United States of America and John W. Holbrook
Defendant:
Kofi Consulting Services, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. TGM Constructors et al
as 3:2009cv00574
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
TGM Constructors, Traylor Bros., Inc., Granite Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00576
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Caddell Construction Co., Inc., St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
