Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ficht v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Farm Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ficht, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatewood et al v. Golden Corral Co
as 1:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert W Gatewood , Betti J Bard , Donna Feyhl and others
Defendant:
Golden Corral Co and Golden DBL Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Teton et al v. May
as 2:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
Sherene Teton and Matthew D Barber
Defendant:
Sarah A May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodrick v. Lampert et al
as 2:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Robert Lampert, Michael Murphy, Prison Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodrick v Lampert et al
as 2:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Robert Lampert, Michael Murphy, Ruby Dickie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodrick v. Lampert et al
as 2:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Robert Lampert, Michael Murphy, Deputy Warden Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sharpe v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jason Nathaniel Sharpe
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Michael J Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kaura v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden et al
as 2:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
James Stanley Kaura
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Michael J Murphy, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
