Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
as 17-17144
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., LORI RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN PENA, ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON, BRETT THOMAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Jeff Silvester, et al v. Kamala Harris
as 14-16840
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, ABRAHAM LINCOLN FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEFF SILVESTER, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., a non-profit organization, BRANDON COMBS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California, in her official capacity
John Teixeira, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 13-17132
Amicus Curiae:
FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, YOUTH ALIVE!, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE NOBRIGA, JOHN TEIXEIRA, GARY GAMAZA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATE MILEY, in his official capacity, ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, as a policy making body, WILMA CHAN, in her official capacity and others
Espanola Jackson, et al v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 12-17803
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, THE LINCOLN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH,, The Abraham Lincoln Foundation for Public Policy Research, Institute on the Constitution, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, and Policy Analysis Center, CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BOYER, DAVID GOLDEN, ESPANOLA JACKSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, EDWIN M. LEE, Mayor for the City and County of San Francisco and GREG SUHR, San Francisco Police Chief
Adam Richards, et al v. Ed Prieto, et al
as 11-16255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM RICHARDS, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ED PRIETO and COUNTY OF YOLO
Adam Richards, et al v. Ed Prieto, et al
as 11-16255
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, ADAM RICHARDS, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF YOLO and ED PRIETO
Edward Peruta, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 10-56971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, LESLIE BUNCHER, Dr., MICHELLE LAXSON and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION, ROBERT T. DOYLE, Marin County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers, et al v. Lindley, et al
as 2:2010cv02010
Plaintiff:
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. , Erik Royce , Brandon Elias and others
Defendant:
Steve Lindley, The State of California and The California Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
