Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Carlos Martinez, Sr. v. Deborah San Juan, et al
as 21-16081
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH SAN JUAN, Board of Parole Hearings - Commissioner, VIJAI DESAI, Board of Parole Hearings - Commissioner and CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS MARTINEZ, Sr.
Andrew Andersen v. Marisela Montes, et al
as 19-16200
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMIZA HOCKENHULL, Deputy Commissioner of California Board of Parole Hearings, NAMEETA SAHNI, JENNIFER SHAFFER, Chief Executive Officer of Board of Parole Hearings and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW ANDERSEN
Robert Glass v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-55592
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the Califorrnia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity and JENNIFER SHAFFER, Director of the California Board of Parole Hearings, individual and official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LATRELLE GLASS
Andrew Andersen v. Marisela Montes, et al
as 19-15969
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMIZA HOCKENHULL, Deputy Commissioner of California Board of Parole Hearings, JENNIFER SHAFFER, Chief Executive Officer of Board of Parole Hearings, NAMEETA SAHNI, Forensic Psychologist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW ANDERSEN
John Clint Draper v. State of California Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 2:2018cv02282
Petitioner:
John Clint Draper
Respondent:
R. Fox, State of California Board of Parole Hearings and The Supreme Court of California
Oscar Clifton v. USDCFR
as 09-73769
:
In re: OSCAR ARCHIE CLIFTON
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARCHIE CLIFTON and OSCAR ARCHIE CLIFTON
Respondent:
USDC, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARING
Lorigo v. Clark et al
as 1:2008cv00972
Petitioner:
Ronald Jay Lorigo
Respondent:
K. Clark , California Board of Parole Hearings and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
