Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Michigan Studs and Walls, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10907
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit & Vicinity, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Michigan Studs and Walls, LLC, Kevin Cox and Nathan McCardell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Manic Construction LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10379
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Manic Construction LLC and Nathan Licavoli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. American Furniture Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10468
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
American Furniture Group, Inc. and Thomas J Doneth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. San Marino Cement Wall, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10861
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
San Marino Cement Wall, Inc. and George Rastelli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. SIXTH REGIONAL REMODELING, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10840
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
SIXTH REGIONAL REMODELING, LLC and MIGUEL VELIZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. PONTIAC DRYWALL SYSTEMS INC et al
as 2:2022cv10832
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
PONTIAC DRYWALL SYSTEMS INC and PHALANDA TRAVIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. E.L.S. Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10088
Defendant:
E.L.S. Construction, Inc. and Edward L. Sickmiller
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund, The Michigan Statewide Carpenters And Millwrights Joint Apprenticeship And Training Fund, Carpenters' Special Assessment Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. BRD, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv13661
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Apprentice Reimbursement Fund, CARPENTERS WORKING DUES FUND, Michigan Fund for the Advancement of the Carpentry Trade and others
Defendant:
Lois Davis and BRD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. San Marino Cement Wall, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv13362
Defendant:
George Rastelli and San Marino Cement Wall, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Carpenters' Steward Fund, THE CARPENTERS BUILDING FUND, The Michigan Statewide Carpenters And Millwrights Joint Apprenticeship And Training Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity et al v. Poncraft Door Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13363
Plaintiff:
The Carpenters Working Dues Fund, THE CARPENTERS BUILDING FUND and Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity
Defendant:
Kevin French and Poncraft Door Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
