Cases 1 - 10 of 63
FAB HABITAT CORPORATION v. MASTERPIECE COLLECTION LLC et al
as 3:2023cv12732
Plaintiff:
FAB HABITAT CORPORATION
Defendant:
MASTERPIECE COLLECTION LLC and MAYANK GOYAL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SIGNATURE CAR COLLECTION, LLC v. STAWARZ et al
as 2:2019cv20634
Defendant:
Robert Stawarz and GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Signature Car Collection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GRACE et al
as 2:2017cv11756
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRIAN JAMES GRACE, MRS. BRIAN JAMES GRACE and PALISADES COLLECTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv08986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DAVID'S BRIDAL, INC v. ROMONA KEVEZA COLLECTION, LLC
as 2:2017cv03797
Plaintiff:
DAVID'S BRIDAL, INC
Defendant:
ROMONA KEVEZA COLLECTION, LLC , ABC CORPORATIONS 1-4 and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KAPLAN et al
as 1:2017cv01760
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID M. KAPLAN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IWORLD LLC et al v. MACBETH COLLECTION, LLC
as 2:2016mc00251
Petitioner:
IWORLD LLC and I WORLD GLOBAL LLC
Respondent:
MACBETH COLLECTION, LLC, MACBETH COLLECTION BY MARGARET JOSEPHS, LLC, MACBETH DESIGNS, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
