Cases 1 - 8 of 8
County of Madera, A Political Subdivision of the State of California et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022at00845
Plaintiff:
County of Madera, A Political Subdivision of the State of California and The People of the State of California, Acting By And Through The County Of Madera
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BNSF Railway Company v. County of San Diego, et al
as 20-15897
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCED, COUNTY OF ORANGE, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 20-15896
Defendant / Appellant:
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, COUNTY OF FRESNO, COUNTY OF PLUMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Hamilton, et al. v. Madera County, et al.
as 1:2020cv00484
Defendant:
John Reed, Tom Wheeler, County of Madera and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hamilton and Rick Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. County of Madera et al
as 3:2018mc80120
Plaintiff:
Roseanna Page
Defendant:
County of Madera , Madera County Department of Corrections , Madera County Department of Mental Health and others
County of Madera v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018at00343
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Madera
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Madera, et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00647
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Madera and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: Clarence Gunter, et al v. Clarence Gunter, et al
as 08-15942
Debtor:
In the Matter of: CLARENCE L GUNTER
Appellant:
HEBER PERRETT, DBA Perrett Ranches
Appellee:
CLARENCE L GUNTER, RENA ZOE GUNTER, DAVID L. GUNTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
