Cases 1 - 10 of 396
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMES HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wooden v. Department of Justice
as 5:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jessie Wooden
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
David Ratcliff v. Darlene Tyler, et al
as 24-11096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARC RATCLIFF
Defendant:
DARLENE TYLER, CARLOS SILVA, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Francois v. Sect Department of Justice
as 9:2024cv80094
Plaintiff:
Rashid Max Francois
Defendant:
Sect Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
