Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 105
M.C. Dean, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 8:2024cv00876
Plaintiff: M.C. Dean, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Argos USA, LLC v. Surecrete, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01456
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Argos USA, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Surecrete, LLC, Dallas Nugent, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of RQ Construction, LLC v. Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv02118
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of RQ Construction, LLC
Defendant: Siemens Government Technologies, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Conner Development Group, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of CONNER DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., and Conner Development Group, Inc.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Sand Point Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00208
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of QUALITY GLASS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: Sand Point Services, LLC, Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland v. C and H Paving, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00098
Defendant: C and H Paving, Inc., C&H Paving, Inc., Quality Asphalt, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
United States of America et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit of Randall Mechanical, Inc., United States for the use and benefit of Randall Electrical Contractors, Inc., United States of America and others
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Metropolitan Interactive, Ltd. v. Quinco Electrical, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv02394
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Interactive, Ltd.
Defendant: Quinco Electrical, Inc., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Metropolitan Interactive, Ltd. v. Quinco Electrical, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv02392
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Interactive, Ltd.
Defendant: Quinco Electrical, Inc., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc. v. TDX Quality, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: TDX Quality, LLC and Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?