Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Hiroshi Horiike, et al v. The Humane Society of the US, et al
as 17-56275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HIROSHI (GENLIN) HORIIKE and WORLD DOG ALLIANCE LTD., a Hong Kong limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and WAYNE PACELLE
Hiroshi Horiike, et al v. Humane Society of the United, et al
as 17-55853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HIROSHI (GENLIN) HORIIKE and WORLD DOG ALLIANCE LTD., a Hong Kong limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WAYNE PACELLE and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Hiroshi Horiike et al v. Humane Society of the United States et al
as 2:2015cv09386
Defendant:
Does, Humane Society of the United States and Wayne Pacelle
Plaintiff:
Hiroshi (Genlin) Horiike and World Dog Alliance LTD.
Robert Hoad, I, et al v. Humane Society of the United S, et al
as 09-56337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALAN HOAD, I, KARIN ANNE HOAD, SCHOOL IN THE CLOUDS ASSISI, a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, a national corporation, HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, an international corporation, WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER, THE FUND FOR ANIMALS, a corporate affiliate and partner and others
Robert Hoad, et al v. Humane Society of the United S, et al
as 09-55795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALAN HOAD, I, KARIN ANNE HOAD, SCHOOL IN THE CLOUDS ASSISI, a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, a national corporation, THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, a California corporation, HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, an international corporation and others
Hoad et al v. Human Society Of The United States et al
as 3:2009cv00338
Plaintiff:
Robert Hoad, Karin Hoad, School In The Clouds assisi and others
Defendant:
Human Society Of The United States, The Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society International and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
