Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Giscombe v. U.S. Department of Labor et al
as 6:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
M. A. Giscombe
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, New York State Department of Labor and Florida Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Oriska Corporation v. Troy Operating Co. LLC
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Troy Operating Co. LLC, (Diamond) Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interest of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Highgate LTC Management, LLC
as 22-1155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Highgate LTC Management, LLC, Employer-Defendant, DBA Northwoods Rehabilitaion & Extended Care, Eugene Nachamkin, Owner-Defendant, Diana R. Koehler, Owner-Defendant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Annette Hall, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representative of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Oriska Corporation v. Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC
as 22-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant:
Niskayuna Operating Co., LLC, Employer-Defendant, Bent Philipson, Owner-Defendant, The Philipson Family Trust, Prohibited Transaction Defendants and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donna Hodge, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appearClass Defendant, Annette Hall, Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant, Karen Grant Williams, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Class Defendant and others
Board of Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds v. Turner Construction Company et al
as 7:2022cv00978
Defendant:
W.W. Patenaude Sons, Inc., Turner Construction Company, United States of America (Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service) and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Oriska Corporation v. Garden Care Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02010
Defendant:
Mr. Benjamin Landa, Grandview Brokerage, Inc., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Oriska Corporation v. Bay Park Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2021cv00762
Defendant:
Bay Park Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Howard Belford and others
Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
