Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Adewole v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Olukemi Adewole
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company doing business as Oral-B
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gloria Quinones v. The Procter and Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01941
Plaintiff:
Gloria Quinones
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eleanor de Leon
as 20-3406
Intervenor:
AL SAFWA INTERNATIONAL COMPANY FOR INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED, a Saudi Arabian Entity, MODERN INDUSTRIES COMPANY-JEDDAH, A Saudi Arabia Entity, AL WAFRA INTERNATIONAL COMPANY FOR INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED and others
Respondent:
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ELEANOR DE LEON
Petitioner:
ELEANOR DE LEON
Rikos et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2016mc00030
Plaintiff:
Dino Rikos , Tracey Burns and Leo Jarzembrowski
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: P&G
as 14-303
Petitioner:
In re: PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Respondent:
LEO JARZEMBROWSKI, On Behalf of Themselves, All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public, TRACEY BURNS, On Behalf of Themselves, All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public and DINO RIKOS, On Behalf of Himself, All Other Similarly Situated and the General Public
In re: P&G
as 14-303
Petitioner:
In re: PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Respondent:
DINO RIKOS, On Behalf of Himself, All Other Similarly Situated and the General Public, TRACEY BURNS, On Behalf of Themselves, All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public and LEO JARZEMBROWSKI, On Behalf of Themselves, All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public
Immerman v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Richard Immerman
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
