Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Driver v. State Farm Texas Lloyds
as 1:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
Thomas Driver
Defendant:
State Farm Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Davee v. State Farm Texas Lloyds
as 1:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
Lori Davee
Defendant:
State Farm Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jones v. State Farm Texas Lloyds
as 1:2013cv00316
Plaintiff:
Steve Jones
Defendant:
State Farm Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lewis et al v. State Farm Texas Lloyds
as 1:2012cv00749
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lewis and David Lewis
Defendant:
State Farm Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Felmann v. State of Arkansas et al
as 3:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Feldmann
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, State of California, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Teters v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2012cv00071
Defendant:
Arnulfo Bravo, Norma E. Ceaser, City of Anthony and others
Plaintiff:
Dolly G. Teters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corrections Corporation of America v. City of Bartlett, Texas
as 6:2011cv00095
Defendant:
City of Bartlett, Texas
Plaintiff:
Corrections Corporation of America
Movant:
TDCJ, State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
State of Texas v. Send Global
as 1:2010cv00886
Defendant:
Send Global
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Schmidt v. Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Texas et al
as 1:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
J. P. Schmidt, J. P. Schmidt, J. P. Schmidt and others
Defendant:
Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Texas, Prime Tempus, Inc., The Department of Financial Services of the State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
