Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Shamal v. Barr
as 20-1573
Respondent / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, William P. Barr, Attorney General and Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ahmad Sameem Shamal
Singh v. Barr
as 20-1438
Respondent:
Jefferey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Daljeet Singh
Rodriguez-Figueroa v. Barr
as 20-1350
Respondent:
Jefferey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention facility, William P. Barr, United States Attorney General and Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Elmer Augusto Rodriguez-Figueroa
Gonzales Garcia v. Barr
as 20-1113
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General, Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal Buffalo Field Office Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Jeffrey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Petitioner:
Selvin Fernando Gonzales Garcia, 215-766-923 Buffalo Federal Detention Facility 4250 Federal Drive Batavia, NY 14020
Fallatah v. Barr
as 20-1089
Petitioner:
Khaled Ali M Fallatah
Respondent:
Jefferey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Gutierrez Cupido v. Barr
as 20-825
Respondent / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Field Office Director Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal Buffalo Field Office Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Elias Guiterrez Cupido, A215-708-481 Buffalo Federal Detention Facility 4250 Federal Drive Batavia, NY 14020 and Jose Elias Gutierrez Cupido, A215-708-481 Buffalo Federal Detention Facility 4250 Federal Drive Batavia, NY 14020
Absolam v. Barr
as 20-353
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal Buffalo Field Office Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, United States Attorney General and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
Colin Anthony Absolam
Petitioner:
Main Street Legal Services, Inc.
Medrano Medrano v. Barr
as 20-107
Petitioner:
Rolando Medrano Medrano
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Field Office Dir Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal Buffalo Field Office Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Sefatullah v. Barr
as 20-69
Petitioner:
Ahmadzai Sefatullah
Respondent:
Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jeffrey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Patalet v. Barr
as 20-67
Respondent:
Thomas Feeley, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, Buffalo Field Office, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jefferey Searls, Facility Acting Director Buffalo Federal Detention facility and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Patrice Patalet, 215-568-347, BUFFALO FEDERAL DETENTION FACILITY, 4250 Federal Drive Batavia, NY 14020
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
