Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Arnold v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Office of the Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz III v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14784
Plaintiff:
Luis G Cruz III
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv05477
Plaintiff:
Demarko Deion Williams
Defendant:
The People of the State of Illinois, Kimberly M Foxx, Alan J Spellberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz III v. Evanston Illinois Law Enforcement Supervisor et al
as 1:2023cv03060
Plaintiff:
Luis G Cruz III
Defendant:
Evanston Illinois Law Enforcement Supervisor, Cook County Dept. of Corrections, Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Taylor v. Hilda Pretty, et al
as 22-2930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
HILDA PRETTY, RN and BEVERLY MILES, RN
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART
Varren King v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 22-1611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VARREN KING
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, R. SZUL, Officer, COOK COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Person v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01647
Plaintiff:
Onassis Person
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05914
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Michael Pettis, Stacy Toms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Cook County Circuit Courts et al
as 1:2021cv05759
Plaintiff:
Brandon Demon Pruitt
Defendant:
Cook County Circuit Courts, Cook County Public Defenders Office, Sheriff Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv02954
Plaintiff:
Edward Bell
Defendant:
Thomas J Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
