Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Lasyone v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
Aaron Bradley Lasyone
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Malay et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Money Coleman
Defendant:
Paul Malay and Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, K. LeGrand, Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Tyler Bolden
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, D. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogue v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Habib Hogue
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, D. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardiman v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Andre Hardiman
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Kara LaGrand, Mr. Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Ivan Cotton
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Markiece Palmer
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, David Rivas, Erin Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00457
Petitioner:
Nicholas Frank Wilcox
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barral v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00438
Petitioner:
Dustin James Barral
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
