Cases 1 - 6 of 6
US Plywood Integrity Coalition v. PFS Corporation
as 0:2021cv60416
Defendant:
PFS Corporation a Wisconsin Corporation doing business as PFS-TECO and Timber Products Inspection Inc.,
Plaintiff:
US Plywood Integrity Coalition
In Re:
Steve Zylkowski
US Plywood Integrity Coalition v. PFS Corporation
as 0:2021cv60417
Defendant:
PFS Corporation a Wisconsin Corporation doing business as PFS-TECO and Timber Products Inspection Inc.,
In Re:
Tom Kositsky
Plaintiff:
US Plywood Integrity Coalition
US Plywood Integrity Coalition v. PFS Corporation
as 0:2021cv60414
Defendant:
PFS Corporation a Wisconsin Corporation doing business as PFS-TECO and Timber Products Inspection Inc.,
In Re:
American Plywood Association
Plaintiff:
US Plywood Integrity Coalition
U.S. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition et al v. PFS Corporation et al
as 0:2019cv62225
Plaintiff:
SDS Lumber Co., Swanson Group, Inc., Murphy Company and others
Defendant:
International Accreditation Service, Inc., Timber Products Inspection, Inc. and PFS Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Osmose, Inc. v. Viance, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Osmose, Inc., Osmose, Inc., Osmose, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Viance, LLC, Viance, LLC, Viance, LLC and others
Consol Cross Defendant:
Paul Goydan
Counter Defendant:
Stephen C. Reeder, Richard J. Ziobro, Paul Goydan and others
Counter Claimant:
Seifollah E. Ghasemi, Seifollah E. Ghasemi, Seifollah E. Ghasemi and others
Movant:
Timber Products Inspection, Inc., Todd P Greer and Timber Products Inspection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
Timber Products Inspection, Inc. v. Unlimited Moving Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02973
Plaintiff:
Timber Products Inspection, Inc.
Defendant:
Unlimited Moving Services, Inc. and Jon Maisano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
