Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Peli Hunt v. Elissa Miller, et al
as 17-56756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PELI POPOVICH HUNT, Individually and as Trustee of Robert and Peli Hunt Living Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
ELISSA D. MILLER, Chapter 7, United States Trustee, PETER C. ANDERSON, DANIEL A. CAPEN, M.D. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03565
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-55845
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-55776
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Michael D Drobot Sr et al
as 8:2013cv00956
Intervenor:
Healthpointe Medical Group, Inc., Khalid Bashir Ahmed, M.D., APC, David Payne, M.D. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Jason Bernard, Gurvinder S. Uppal, Jacob E. Tauber, M.D., a Professional Corporation and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Long Beach Pain Center Medical Clinic, Inc., Michael D. Drobot, Sr., Pacific Hospital of Long Beach and others
Defendant:
First Medical Management, Inc., International Implants LLC, Industrial Pharmacy Management LLC and others
Petitioner:
Anthony G Graham & Martin, Dr. Khalid Ahmed, Christina G Hernandez and others
Counter Defendant:
State Compensation Insurance Fund
Interested Party:
John Larsen and John Larsen, M.D., A Professional Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02705
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06600
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
