Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Ruggiero v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc., et al.
as 1:2016cv00329
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ruggiero
Defendant:
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Inc and Reynolds American Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2016md02695
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dunn , Ceyhan Haksal , Michael Robinson and others
Defendant:
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. and Reynolds American, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUGGIERO v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. et al
as DC/1:16-cv-00493
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RUGGIERO
Defendant:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC.
RUGGIERO v. SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00493
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RUGGIERO
Defendant:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Ruggiero
as 0:2013mc60458
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy Ruggiero
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Ruggiero v. Richert
as 1:2010cv23539
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ruggiero
Defendant:
Elizabeth K. Richert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
