Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pililimis v. Northern Alliance Management, LLC
as 1:2016cv01014
Defendant:
Northern Alliance Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pililimis v. Yancey, Murphy & Associates et al
as 1:2013mi00168
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Yancey, Murphy & Associates and Phillip C. Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Pililimis v. Reliance Exchange Group, LLC
as 1:2013mi00166
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Reliance Exchange Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Pililimis v. Performance Asset Recovery
as 1:2013cv05392
Defendant:
Performance Asset Recovery
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pililimis v. Reliance Exchange Group, LLC
as 1:2013cv02869
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Reliance Exchange Group, LLC and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pililimis v. Mirand Response Systems, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01822
Defendant:
Mirand Response Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pililimis v. Yancey, Murphy & Associates et al
as 1:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Yancey, Murphy & Associates and Phillip C. Owens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pililimis v. Yancey Murphy & Associates
as 1:2013cv01823
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Yancey Murphy & Associates
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Pililimis v. Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC
as 1:2013cv01633
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pililimis v. Simon Eichler & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pililimis
Defendant:
Simon Eichler & Associates, LLC and Christopher Hess
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
