Cases 1 - 7 of 7
KPMG, LLP v. Tongxin International, Ltd et al
as 1:2013cv04567
Petitioner:
KPMG, LLP
Respondent:
Tongxin International, Ltd and The Audit Committee of Tongxin International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Todd Augenbaum v. Tongxin International, LTD et al
as 2:2011cv04815
Plaintiff:
Todd Augenbaum
Defendant:
Jacqueline Chang, Tongxin International, LTD, Rudy Wilson and others
Movant:
Mark Grusich, Michael A. Goldstein, Eric W. Goldstein, and Daniel J. Rock and Kathleen A. Rock on behalf of SEP IRA f/b/o Daniel J. Rock, IRA f/b/o Kathleen Rock and Daniel J. and Kathleen A. Rock Trust u/a/d 2/7/0 and Tongxin Shareholder Group
Richard A Potrykus v. Tongxin International, Ltd. et al
as 2:2011cv00803
Defendant:
Jacqueline Chang, Tongxin International, Ltd., Rudy Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A Potrykus
Hong Liu v. Tongxin International Ltd. et al
as 2:2011cv00671
Defendant:
Jackie Chang, Zhang Duanxiang, Tongxin International Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Hong Liu
Michael A. Goldstein v. Tongxin International Ltd. et al
as 2:2011cv00348
Plaintiff:
Guy Castleberry, Michael A. Goldstein, Hoai Jones and others
Defendant:
Jackie Chang, Zhang Duanxiang, Tongxin International Ltd. and others
Augenbaum v. Tongxin International, LTD et al
as 1:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Todd Augenbaum
Defendant:
Jacqueline Chang, Tongxin International, LTD, Rudy Wilson and others
Movant:
Mark Grusich and Tongxin Shareholder Group
Interested Party:
Michael A. Goldstein, Eric W. Goldstein, and Daniel J. Rock and Kathleen A. Rock on behalf of SEP IRA f/b/o Daniel J. Rock, IRA f/b/o Kathleen Rock and Daniel J. and Kathleen A. Rock Trust u/a/d 2/7/0
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Tongxin International Ltd v. Jacqueline Chang et al
as 2:2010cv09542
Defendant:
Jacqueline Chang and Does
Plaintiff:
Tongxin International Ltd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
