Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv18091
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DIRECTOR THOMAS A. ARNONE and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Belmar Against 5G Towers, Lawrence Reynolds, Rose Daganya and others
Counter Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
TFORCE FREIGHT INC. v. US TOWER CORP
as 2:2022cv05470
Plaintiff:
TFORCE FREIGHT INC.
Defendant:
US TOWER CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
INTER CITY TIRE AND AUTO CENTER, INC. et al v. ACTION SUPPLY, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv07785
Petitioner:
INTER CITY TIRE AND AUTO CENTER, INC. and INTER CITY RETREAD, INC.
Respondent:
ACTION SUPPLY, INC., ADVANTAGE RENTAL CENTER, INC., BRADWAY PROPERTIES, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
SMALLS v. RIVIERA TOWERS CORPORATION(RTC) et al
as 2:2012cv06312
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SMALLS
Defendant:
RIVIERA TOWERS CORPORATION(RTC), KENNETH BLANE, ESQ., JOHN NEGRI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
DELRIO-MOCCI et al v. CONNOLLY PROPERTIES INC. et al
as 2:2008cv02753
Plaintiff:
MARIBEL DELRIO-MOCCI, LINDA ELLIOT and ROBERT BOLMER
Defendant:
CONNOLLY PROPERTIES INC., DAVID M. CONNOLLY, DONNA X. CONNOLLY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BELL v. TOWER MANAGEMENT SERVICE, L.P. et al
as 3:2007cv05305
Plaintiff:
DENISE BELL
Defendant:
TOWER MANAGEMENT SERVICE, L.P., BARBARA PERRY, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
