Cases 1 - 10 of 16
William Martin et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv10518
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Mitchell and William Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rector v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
as 2:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Channon W. Rector
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Pag-Daly City et al
as 3:2012cv03104
Plaintiff:
Yanira Martinez and Jose Guevara
Defendant:
Pag-Daly City and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Sophia Chiquito et al v. DWWTR Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00844
Plaintiff:
Gabrol L Bargas and Sophia Chiquito
Defendant:
DWWTR Inc, Does, Toyota Financial Services CDE Corporation and others
David P Navarro v. C&M Motors LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00161
Defendant:
C&M Motors LLC, Does and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Plaintiff:
David P Navarro
Crystal Gilmore et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Crystal Gilmore and Ron McClelland
Defendant:
Toyota Material Handling, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc. and others
Oscar Centeno v. McCall Automotive Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10067
Plaintiff:
Oscar Centeno
Defendant:
Does, McCall Automotive Inc and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Ebel Y Guerra et al v. DWWSB Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09928
Defendant:
DWWSB Inc, Does and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Plaintiff:
Angela A Galvez and Ebel Y Guerra
Richard Centeno et al v. McCall Automotive Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09770
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Centeno and Richard Centeno
Defendant:
Does, McCall Automotive Inc and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Ebel Guerra v. DWWSB Inc et al
as 2:2011cv09765
Defendant:
DWWSB Inc, Does and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ebel Guerra
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
