Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BENSALEM LANDMARK PLAZA v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
as 2:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
BENSALEM LANDMARK PLAZA
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
HERITAGE SENIOR LIVING, LLC et al. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
as 2:2021cv02555
Defendant:
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Plaintiff:
HERITAGE SENIOR LIVING, LLC and HERITAGE SENIOR PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPERIOR GROUP, INC. et al v. THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR GROUP, INC. , SUPERIOR TUBE COMPANY , ANCHOR/DARLING VALVE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY , TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY , THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FREEDOM CHRISTIAN BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
as 2:2013cv04489
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM CHRISTIAN BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
Defendant:
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT v. HOSKINS et al
as 2:2012cv06132
Plaintiff:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Defendant:
SHIRDA HOSKINS, DARNELL HUDSON, PHILLY CAR SHARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BARRETT et al v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
as 5:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
DIANE BARRETT and CHRISTOPHER BARRETT
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORFAB CORPORATION v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
as 2:2007cv04482
Plaintiff:
NORFAB CORPORATION
Defendant:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
