Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jose Mendoza, Jr., et al v. Amalgamated Transit Union, et al
as 20-16079
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROLYN HIGGINS, JAMES LINDSAY III, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBBIE HARRIS, ROBERT NAYLOR, LINDA JOHNSON-SANDERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE MENDOZA, Jr.
Jose Mendoza, Jr., et al v. Amalgamated Transit Union, et al
as 20-16080
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROLYN HIGGINS, JAMES LINDSAY III, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBBIE HARRIS, ROBERT NAYLOR, CEASAR JIMENEZ and others
Mendoza et al v. Amalgamated Transit Union International et al
as 2:2018cv00959
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union International, Hearing Officer Antonette Bryant, Lawrence J. Hanley and others
Plaintiff:
Myeko Easley, Robbie Harris, Dennis Hennessey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0411 Labor Organizations
Jose Mendoza, Jr. v. Amalgamated Transit Union, et al
as 17-17429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MENDOZA, Jr., individually and as a member and representative of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1637
Defendant - Appellee:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION INTERNATIONAL, JAMES LINDSAY III, ATUI Vice President, LAWRENCE HANLEY, Union President and others
Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union International et al
as 2:2017cv02485
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union International, Antonette Bryant, Lawrence J. Hanley and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Mendoza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Design Basics, LLC et al v Tyler Homes Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv00272
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC and Plan Pros, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyler Homes Incorporated, Tyler Custom Homes, Ltd., James R. Harmeyer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Design Basics, LLC et al v. Tyler Homes Incorporated
as 4:2014cv00270
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC and Plan Pros, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyler Homes Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 041
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
