Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Leek v. Edmonds et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00711
Defendant: Jeffrey Stroehlein, Robert McGee, Roscoe Bridges and others
Plaintiff: Brandon Michael Leek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bible v. Edmonds et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00735
Plaintiff: Daniel J. Bible
Defendant: Tyler R. Edmonds and J. Jeremy Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mary Shepard, et al v. Lisa Madigan, et al
as 14-3403
Defendant / Appellant: LISA MADIGAN, solely in her official capacity as Attorney General of Illinois, TYLER R. EDMONDS, solely in his official capacity as the State's Attorney of Union County, Illinois and PATRICK J. QUINN, solely in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois
Plaintiff / Appellee: ILLINOIS STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION and MARY E. SHEPARD
Mary Shepard, et al v. Lisa Madigan, et al
as 14-3403
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARY E. SHEPARD and ILLINOIS STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant: LISA MADIGAN, solely in her official capacity as Attorney General of Illinois, PATRICK J. QUINN, solely in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois and TYLER R. EDMONDS, solely in his official capacity as the State's Attorney of Union County, Illinois
Mary Shepard, et al v. Lisa Madigan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2661
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARY E. SHEPARD and ILLINOIS STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: LISA MADIGAN, solely in her official capacity as Attorney General of Illinois, PATRICK J. QUINN, solely in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois, TYLER R. EDMONDS, solely in his official capacity as the State's Attorney of Union County, Illinois and others
Mary Shepard, et al v. Lisa Madigan, et al
as 13-2661
Defendant / Appellee: LISA MADIGAN, solely in her official capacity as Attorney General of Illinois, TYLER R. EDMONDS, solely in his official capacity as the State's Attorney of Union County, Illinois, PATRICK J. QUINN, solely in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ILLINOIS STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION and MARY E. SHEPARD
Union County, Illinois, et al v. Merscorp, Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1794
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNION COUNTY, ILLINOIS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, TYLER R. EDMONDS, State's Attorney for the County of Union and others
Defendant - Appellee: MERSCORP, INCORPORATED, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Union County, Illinois, et al v. Merscorp, Incorporated, et al
as 13-1794
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONWIDE ADVANTAGE MORTGAGE COMPANY, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRY BARTRUFF, Clerk of the County of Union on behalf of the County of Union, Illinois and all counties in Illinois, TYLER R. EDMONDS, State's Attorney for the County of Union, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Union County, Illinois, et al v. Merscorp, Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNION COUNTY, ILLINOIS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, TYLER R. EDMONDS, State's Attorney for the County of Union and others
Defendant - Appellee: MERSCORP, INCORPORATED, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Union County, Illinois, et al v. Merscorp, Incorporated, et al
as 13-1443
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONWIDE ADVANTAGE MORTGAGE COMPANY, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRY BARTRUFF, Clerk of the County of Union on behalf of the County of Union, Illinois and all counties in Illinois, TYLER R. EDMONDS, State's Attorney for the County of Union, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?